Compare and Contrast the
similarities and differences between Biocentric Preservation and Utilitarian Conservation.
The term Biocentric
Preservation is defined as such: someone who values natural resources because
of their usefulness for practical purposes, but uses them sensibly and
carefully. A person who values these ideals is not concerned with the entire
big picture of the situation, but believes that a little effort makes a big
difference in the long run. They are more concerned with the logical
course of action, and take more time planning a legally and politically correct
way of tackling the problem.
Alternatively, the term
Utilitarian Conservation describes the other side of the spectrum, and defines
the person who believes in protecting nature because all forms of life deserve
respect and consideration, not just in terms of profit or practicality. These
kinds of people tend to be more eccentric and idealistic, trying to look out
for every single thing on the spectrum while abandoning logical ideas and
actions. Basically, they focus more on abandoning as many harmful actions
towards the environment as the Biocentric Preservationists, but take drastic
measures to do so and end up causing confusion for both parties.
These two terms are
similar in terms of the few basic ideas (preserving nature, creating
environmental laws and protecting wildlife), but they are fundamentally
different and oppose each other's thinking. While the Biocentric
Preservationists logically create ways to handle a situation in a way that benefits
both parties, and focus more on smaller-scale situations, the Utilitarian Conservationists
go whole hog and put the salvation of the natural species before anything else.
They think in terms of the big picture, the global view, and so the legal repercussions
do not matter in the long run
Optional- Describe the
environmental impact of an environmental “incident” (fire, hazardous material
spill, ecosystem disruption, either natural or man-made) in your bio-region. How had this incident affected the local economy?
When something small
such as a fire occurs in your town, you don’t think too much of the external
consequences that arise from an event such as this. In fact, something as small
as one fire can leave drastic consequences for the economy of the town you live
in.
Only when you consider
the larger implications that something so harmless as one house burning down
can have for the environment and the larger global community can you begin to
realize that we are all, in fact, connected in some way. As a natural or
man-made disaster occurs, so too does the increasing need to fix said disaster
in an economically convenient way.
These things known as Environmental
Impact Statements affect the government’s consideration of whether or not to
approve of funding certain environmental projects. For example, by deciding to finance
the construction of a dam, they need to produce a cost-effective analysis which
can establish the solution that is least damaging to the economy.
No comments:
Post a Comment